Apple announced earlier this month that as senior vice president of Devices Hardware Engineering. However, and launched a lawsuit to block it from happening.
At the core of its case IBM says Papermaster has knowledge of "significant and highly confidential IBM trade secrets" that would "irreparably harm" the company if he is allowed to work for Apple. Papermaster also signed a noncompetition agreement in 2006 pledging not to work for competitors for one year after the conclusion of his employment with IBM.
Ultimately, . Judge Kenneth Karas told Papermaster to "immediately cease his employment with Apple until further order of this court."
Papermaster contends that IBM's noncompetition agreement precludes him from working for any Business Enterprise or any major competitor of IBM. The lawsuit argues that since IBM business enterprise services and Apple's business is the design, manufacturing and marketing of consumer electronic products, the two are not major competitors.
Providing further evidence of the noncompetitive nature of the companies, Papermaster further explains that at IBM he was the vice president of Blade Development, while in his role at Apple he would be in charge of product development for the iPod and the iPhone.
The countersuit asserts the noncompetitive agreement "is unreasonably broad in that it purports to impose an unreasonably lengthy time limitation. In the world of technology, any trade secrets that Mr. Papermaster possesses would lose their value prior to the expiration of a year."
Papermaster says the noncompetitive agreement is flawed in another way. The agreement says that it is "governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York," but he worked in Texas and Apple is in California. Both of those states hold such noncompetition agreements are unenforceable.
When he accepted the job at Apple, Papermaster said he signed an Intellectual Property Agreement in which he agreed not to disclose or bring onto Apple property any "confidential, or proprietary, or secret information" of IBM.
Papermaster is seeking a declaratory judgement that the Noncompetition Agreement is unreasonably overbroad and unenforceable.